Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Part II): Guidelines for Performing the Systematic Review

imageIn Part I of this series, we provide guidance for preparing a systematic review protocol. In this article, we highlight important steps and supplement with exemplars on conducting and reporting the results of a systematic review. We suggest how authors can manage protocol violations, multiplicity of outcomes and analyses, and heterogeneity. The quality (certainty) of the evidence and strength of recommendations should follow the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. It is our goal that Part II of this series provides valid guidance to authors and peer reviewers who conduct systematic reviews to adhere to important constructs of transparency, structure, reproducibility, and accountability. This will likely result in more rigorous systematic reviews being submitted for publication to the journals like Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

from Anesthesia & Analgesia - Latest Articles https://ift.tt/C7Sr5zB
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Danavorexton (TAK-925): A Promising Breakthrough in Combating Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression

Podcast and Review of the Fundamentals, Applications, and Limitations of Cerebral Oximetry

Remimazolam Reduces Risk for Intraoperative Hypotension in Interventional Radiology